This wiki is a XML full dump clone of "Heroes Wiki", the main wiki about the Heroes saga that has been shut down permanently since June 1, 2020. The purpose of this wiki is to keep online an exhaustive and accurate database about the franchise.
Talk:Explosion: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hardvice m Talk:Nuclear explosion moved to Talk:Explosion: more ambiguous as to nature of explosion |
imported>Hardvice No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I think there are some dubious statements in the article. They treat Peter's dream as an exact prophecy, when it might be something more symbolic than literal. I'm going to tone down the language a bit. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 17:15, 5 December 2006 (EST) | I think there are some dubious statements in the article. They treat Peter's dream as an exact prophecy, when it might be something more symbolic than literal. I'm going to tone down the language a bit. --[[User:Ted C|Ted C]] 17:15, 5 December 2006 (EST) | ||
:Good call, I was thinking the same thing. At this point we should just treat it as a vision which could be more symbolic than literal as you said. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 17:17, 5 December 2006 (EST)) | :Good call, I was thinking the same thing. At this point we should just treat it as a vision which could be more symbolic than literal as you said. ([[User:Admin|Admin]] 17:17, 5 December 2006 (EST)) | ||
==New lead text== | |||
"Destined to occur" makes it sound as if it's inevitable. We don't really know that it is.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 18:08, 5 December 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 23:08, 5 December 2006
Article Name Change
Have they ever called it a "nuclear" explosion on the show? ... In light of tonight's episode, and Peter's revelation that he is the explosion, I nominate that we change the name of this article to simply the "Explosion", since there is nothing nuclear about it. Thoughts? - RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 23:36, 4 December 2006 (EST)
- The have used the word "bomb" to describe it. However, I do propose a change now, as opposed to later when we have more articles to fix. ----
23:50, 4 December 2006 (EST) - Perhaps just "The Explosion" would be sufficient. --Ted C 17:16, 5 December 2006 (EST)
Qualify Statements
I think there are some dubious statements in the article. They treat Peter's dream as an exact prophecy, when it might be something more symbolic than literal. I'm going to tone down the language a bit. --Ted C 17:15, 5 December 2006 (EST)
- Good call, I was thinking the same thing. At this point we should just treat it as a vision which could be more symbolic than literal as you said. (Admin 17:17, 5 December 2006 (EST))
New lead text
"Destined to occur" makes it sound as if it's inevitable. We don't really know that it is.--Hardvice (talk) 18:08, 5 December 2006 (EST)