Talk:Future Hiro's message
Family Guy Parody
- Have you all seen the Family Guy Parody? "Save The Baby, Save The World" ... flash to Stewie dressed as a cheerleader, and then Stewie atop a bound and gagged cheerleader. To top it off, it ends with the "Family Guy" title on top of a solar eclipse. Freakin' awesome!
- (PS - Anyone up for starting an article/category for parodies (like Lostpedia did?) Ryangibsonstewart 20:07, 27 November 2006 (EST)
If, Then
- Didn't Hiro say that it WAS an "If, Then"? I thought it was Ando who was trying to convince him that it wasn't. The article currently states that Hiro says it wasn't an "If, Then". (Admin 13:25, 5 December 2006 (EST))
- Just watched it again and confirmed that it was Hiro that stated it was an "if, then" statement. Article has been corrected. (Admin 13:55, 5 December 2006 (EST))
References to "save the cheerleader" in other works
I think we should add a section like this, like Ryan suggests above and Lostpedia has. Heroe 15:50, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Do we have other examples to add? If not, it will be a sad and lonely little article.--Hardvice (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- I actually think we're about ready for a "Parody" article. I have a clip of it featured on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. I believe it was in a promo for Epic Movie (in which Jayma Mays appears). It was used on a promo for The Simpsons on a local PA station. And it was mentioned on an episode of Studio 60 when Masi Oka guest starred. But the funniest, by far, was the Family Guy clip, of course. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- I don't watch it regularly any more, but from what I've seen I've actually found Family Guy very uneven ever since it came back. I think the South Park guys were dead on: it's like it's written at random by a tank full of manatees these days. Well, OK -- except for the barbershop quartet song about AIDS. That was funny.--Hardvice (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah, see, that's precisely why I like Family Guy. (And I'm sure Admin will back me up here...) I like the non sequiturs, the random references, the complete and total adherence to the principles of absurdism. And, yes, the "not HIV, but full-blown AIDS" song was tops. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:47, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- See, before it was canceled, I thought it was random and funny. Now it's mostly just random. I don't know if it's actually changed or if it's just worn thin with me, but every time I watch it, I find myself chuckling instead of laughing. But heck, even at its best, it was no Bald Soprano.--Hardvice (talk) 16:54, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Ah, see, that's precisely why I like Family Guy. (And I'm sure Admin will back me up here...) I like the non sequiturs, the random references, the complete and total adherence to the principles of absurdism. And, yes, the "not HIV, but full-blown AIDS" song was tops. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:47, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- I don't watch it regularly any more, but from what I've seen I've actually found Family Guy very uneven ever since it came back. I think the South Park guys were dead on: it's like it's written at random by a tank full of manatees these days. Well, OK -- except for the barbershop quartet song about AIDS. That was funny.--Hardvice (talk) 16:16, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- I actually think we're about ready for a "Parody" article. I have a clip of it featured on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. I believe it was in a promo for Epic Movie (in which Jayma Mays appears). It was used on a promo for The Simpsons on a local PA station. And it was mentioned on an episode of Studio 60 when Masi Oka guest starred. But the funniest, by far, was the Family Guy clip, of course. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:58, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
Nathan's interpretation
When Nathan tells Peter in the finale, 'You saved the cheerleader...so we could save the world', who is the we? 'We' as in the Petrelli brothers, or 'we' as in everyone else there at Kirby Plaza? Just curious what you guys thought. OUChevelleSS 14:30, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
- Maybe both? Kind of a double meaning. — RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:11, 27 May 2007 (EDT)
Timeline
According to our timeline, FHiro visited Peter on the subway on October 5, 2006. According to the string web, this occurred on October 4, 2006. I'm confused. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
Title?
- Shouldn't this be decapitalised, so it's The message? Just a minor point.-- Lost Soul talk contribs 14:47, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
- Probably. But then again, the article "the" probably doesn't need to be here, either in that case. Either way. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
- I think we ought to move it, but "Message" seems a bit generic. Howabout "Future Hiro's message"?--Hardvice (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- That's fine. The text of the message ("save the cheerleader, save the world") is also a good choice in this case. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- That may be a better choice altogether. Although since we're trying to call it an "event", maybe the delivery of the message is better than the content? I dunno, I'm torn.--Hardvice (talk) 03:14, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- On second thought, the text might be just a bit too long. Redirects already cover it for searching purposes, I believe; we're probably better off with calling it "Future Hiro's message". Either that or "Holy shabizzle moment from Season One". -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 03:22, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- That may be a better choice altogether. Although since we're trying to call it an "event", maybe the delivery of the message is better than the content? I dunno, I'm torn.--Hardvice (talk) 03:14, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- That's fine. The text of the message ("save the cheerleader, save the world") is also a good choice in this case. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 03:12, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- I think we ought to move it, but "Message" seems a bit generic. Howabout "Future Hiro's message"?--Hardvice (talk) 03:08, 12 November 2007 (EST)
- Probably. But then again, the article "the" probably doesn't need to be here, either in that case. Either way. -- RyanGibsonStewart (talk) 16:16, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
Return of The Message?
Anyone else think The Message is about to make a comeback? Claire is in clear danger, and is apparently the catalyst. If she were to die... well, that would be pretty bad. "Save the cheerleader, save the world", indeed. --Ricard Desi 13:36, 29 November 2008 (EST)
- Haha, I have no doubt they'll be saying that a few more times before the end of the volume... Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ U | T | C ] 15:48, 29 November 2008 (EST)
- Oh wow, talk about ridiculous timing. The Eclipse, Part 2 had... well, part of it at least. --Ricard Desi 16:48, 3 December 2008 (EST)
Explosion Hiro wanted past Peter to save the cheerleader since explosion Hiro was immortal. Even if Claire would die now, nothing bad would happen. Things would be better since the catalyst dies with her... Maybe its save the cheerleader from getting caught by Arthur :| - Discipol
Explosion Hiro was not immortal, Explosion Parkman killed him remember? Intuitive Empath - Talk - Contributions 13:22, 5 December 2008 (EST)